The rest is silence

I found Act 5 to be quite disappointing; I cannot believe that EVERYONE died.  I was happy that Shakespeare let Horatio live, but I did not find it necessary that everyone else had to die.  It starts out with the “clowns” digging the grave, with a little bit of comic relief in the dreary situation.  I liked how Shakespeare made the event less gloomy by adding confusion and dramatic irony when Hamlet did not know the burial was for his former lover Ophelia, and the clowns did not know they were speaking to Hamlet. 

            The second scene was a bloody ending for the tragic play.  First as Hamlet is winning against Laertes, Gertrude decides to take a drink from the poisoned cup meant for Hamlet.  Before Claudius can warn her, she drinks from it and dies, and the King was the reason for the death of his wife who he murdered his brother to marry.  Then Hamlet and Laertes both hit each other with the poisoned sword and therefore are both about to die. When Hamlet finds out about this, he quickly takes the sword and stabs Claudius, and forces him to drink the rest of the poisoned wine.  Thank goodness he finally killed him!  Claudius dies yelling out for help, “O, yet defend me, friends. I am but hurt.”  He seems like such a coward here yelling out for someone to save him before Hamlet kills him.  This made me dislike Claudius even more, if that is possible, because he expected people to save him after all the horrible and cruel things that he had done, and did not die nobly like Hamlet and Laertes.  I was so happy when that happened; I was beginning to think Hamlet would not have the guts to kill Claudius.  In their last moments, Hamlet and Laertes exchanged forgiveness and told Horatio to set the story straight for the public.  Finally the people of Denmark will know all the horrible things King Claudius had done!

My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth!

Hamlet said this quote at the end of Act 4, scene 4, when he had just talked with the Captain of Fortinbras’ army.  He saw that thousands of men were fighting over this small piece of land that he says would not even be large enough to bury all the dead soldiers.  Hamlet saw himself as more of a coward when he witnessed this, saying,

Rightly to be great

Is not to stir without great argument, 

But greatly to find quarrel in a straw

When honor’s at the stake.”

Here he is saying that to be great, he must fight over nothing when his honor is at stake.  He is inspired by the soldiers who are fighting for the small piece of land, just for their honor, and decides that he will soon get revenge on Claudius, and says “My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth!” 

In the first scene, Gertrude tells Claudius that Hamlet murdered Polonius, which angers Cluadius, and he decides to send Hamlet to England to be murdered.  This just makes me hate the two of them even more, Hamlet was just trying to tell his mother the truth and she goes and betrays him by telling Claudius.  I cannot believe that Claudius can be so evil; he does not seem to have any sympathy or care for anyone but himself!  Then, when Laertes comes back and learns of his father’s death, he wants one thing, revenge on Hamlet.  After finding out that Hamlet was returning and his plan to have him murdered in England, this makes Claudius happy.  So together they come up with a plan to have an unfair duel between the Laertes and Hamlet in which Laetes has the sharper sword with poison on the tip.  Claudius is even so evil that he came up with a back up plan in case Laertes loses!  This angers me so much, and I know that since this is a tragedy everyone is going to die in the end, but I really hope that Hamlet gets his revenge on Claudius first!

I will speak daggers to her, but use none

I was very glad while reading this act that Hamlet is finally taking some action.  He was beginning to seem like he was not going to do much to avenge his father, especially with his “to be or not to be” speech, deciding whether or not to kill himself and save himself from all the pain of living.  That part made me mad, I would be mad if Hamlet just gave up like that, I really want him to get revenge on Claudius.  That part also kind of made me sad when he told Ophelia that does not love her, I wanted them to be together, however I still have to wonder if he somehow had an idea that someone was listening in or that she would tell them and was not telling the whole truth.  Hamlet seems to be pretty clever, so I am excited to see how the rest of the play goes.  His play was another clever ideas of his, so that he could be completely sure that Claudius did murder King Hamlet, and I am really glad that this prompted Hamlet to take action.  He went to tell his mother the whole truth, and “speak daggers to her”.  He finally tells her how angry he is that she remarried so quickly and takes a stand for himself.  Then, when Polonius, who was hiding and listening, started to come out from behind a tapestry, Hamlet stabs him, thinking it is Claudius!  I could not believe that Polonius died, however, I am not sure how I feel about it yet.  Polonius did seem pretty manipulative to me, as he told Ophelia to avoid Hamlet, and sent people to spy on Laertes.  Now Hamlet is going away to England with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, but I am quite curious to see how this play will wrap up, it is getting pretty exciting now that Hamlet is starting to take action!

what is this quintessence of dust?

After reading Act II of Hamlet, it left me wanting to know what is going to happen next in the plot, as so much was set up in this act, and the conflict is building.  Throughout this act, Hamlet seems a bit crazy and depressed, and tells his friends that life has lost meaning for him, and humans are the “quintessence of dust”.  This makes me wonder whether Hamlet will be able to come back from this state.  I think that the play should end with Hamlet getting together with Ophelia, getting revenge on Claudius, and becoming king, however I know that this is a Shakespearean tragedy and will not have a happy ending unfortunately.  First, Polonius sent Reynaldo to spy on Laertes in France.  This makes me wonder if Laertes will find out about what his father has done and have a larger part in the play later on.  Then, Ophelia comes in to tell Polonius that Hamlet came to see her and is still in love with her.  I was not able to tell for sure if Polonius was being genuine about being sorry for having Ophelia ignore Hamlet, but it kind of sounded like he regretted it, and before truly believed that Hamlet did not love her.  He says, “I am sorry that with better heed and judgment I had not quoted him” and this makes me think that he might be truly regretful of what he told Ophelia to do.  Then, Fortinbras requested permission from Claudius to allow his soldiers to pass through Denmark on their way to attack the Poles.  Claudius gladly approves, as he has gotten out of a war with Fortinbras, however, I still wonder if this plan will fall through, is Fortinbras really trustworthy even though he swore never to attack the Danes?  Also, Hamlet has decided to write a play about his late father and tempt Claudius into a confession for the murder of King Hamlet.  I am quite curious to see how this plays out, I wonder if Hamlet has the guts to get revenge for his father on Claudius.

“Something is rotten in the state of Denmark”

I think this quote, said by Marcellus, accurately depicts this play so far, as the king was killed by his brother, who is the new king and has disregarded Prince Hamlet, who should have been the heir to the throne. After reading act one in Hamlet, I became very excited for what is to come in the next four acts and how the story will continue to develop.  The first act left me with several questions of what was going on before the start of the play and what will unfold in the end.  I could not help but feel sympathy for Prince Hamlet, as his uncle Claudius is a complete jerk.  Poor Hamlet is still sad about his father’s death, yet everyone around his has moved on, especially his mother and uncle, and “the funeral baked meats did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables” (Shakespeare 18).  King Hamlet’s widow married his brother so soon after his death that the food leftover from the funeral would still be good for the wedding.  Everyone is so cruel to Prince Hamlet and tell him that it is unmanly to still be mourning, but I think the rest of them are way too cold-hearted, I mean how can Gertrude marry her husband’s brother and why so quickly after his death? 

             I also am quite curious to find out about why Claudius murdered King Hamlet.  Was he just jealous of his brother’s success, or was there a disagreement in how to run the country of Denmark?  And why isn’t Hamlet king, why would he not be the next heir to the throne?  I was really excited when the ghost finally talked and had a conversation with Hamlet and we learned the story of how he died.  I really hope that in the next few acts Hamlet takes action against Claudius and reveals to the people the evil man that he is, and gets revenge for his father’s death.

My Own Poem

Rosa Parks 

 

Approaching,

the white man

angrily stares her down.

Sitting amongst the sea of white,

She does not move.

 

One small refusal

sparks huge attacks.

One small resistance

brings inspiration to all

One small opposition

makes a difference.

 

The police come take her.

Under arrest, losing her job,

Giving up her small luxuries,

But not giving in.

 

Rosa Parks will forever be

Honored and Remembered,

One woman can make the difference

One small action will bring us closer

to the day when segregation is terminated,

And we are at last

Set Free.

 

 

I attempted to imitate Hayden’s style in this poem about Rosa Parks.  Several of Hayden’s poems center around a prominent leader in the African American struggles for freedom.  I chose to write a poem using the similar idea about Rosa Parks.  Hayden has an interesting way of writing; while some of his poems are written with long lines, for example, in “Frederick Douglass”, others are written with one to two word lines, like in “The Diver”.  However, I found that most of his poems of a shorter length have shorter lines, so I decided to make my lines short as well.  I tried to incorporate his ideas by creating a hopeful poem in which I assure the reader that freedom will come for African Americans and one person can make a difference.  I also added in some elements such as repetition of certain phrases, free verse, and enjambment, or continuing a sentence on the next line for emphasis, because I found these to be common in most of Hayden’s poems.

Comments

Comment 1: http://laurenegr1.edublogs.org/2009/03/09/langston-hughes/#comments

Comment 2:  http://maddieegr1.edublogs.org/2009/03/09/adrienne-rich-biography/#respond

Comment 3:  http://annalegr5.edublogs.org/2009/03/26/intertextuality-in-the-moment/#comment-8

Comment 4: http://meganegr5.edublogs.org/2009/03/26/looking-back-pound-and-angelou/#comment-8

Comment 5: http://reneegr1.edublogs.org/2009/03/19/a-second-analysis-jardin-con-nino/#comment-7

How I felt about blogging:

I enjoyed this project, and it was a lot more fun than a research paper would have been.  At first I was hesitant towards the blog, since I did not know anything about it, but it turned out to be fun and easy to work the blog.  It was interesting to be able to see the progress of my classmates’ blogs and be able to comment on their blogs.  However, I did find it frustrating at points, especially when I could not find anyone on the “blogosphere” who talked about my poet.  I also felt that for some of the posts we did not get enough time to find enough research and information to write it.  Other than that, I liked this project a lot, and not as overwhelming as a research paper would have been.   

 

Robert Hayden and Langston Hughes

Most of Robert Hayden’s poetry was written during the Harlem Renaissance, and he was influenced greatly by the works of Langston Hughes.  Hughes was the father of jazz poetry and wrote of the struggles of the African Americans.  Hayden was inspired by his ideas and values and wrote about similar subjects. 

 Langston Hughes, and Robert Hayden spoke for the people with powerful simplicity. The poetry sings for all of us with sadness, anger, humor, and grace” (MEL).

Hughes incorporated jazz greatly into his writing, as it was the only true African American art form, and used characteristics such as repetition and musical rhythm.  Hayden also incorporates these characteristics into his writing; he uses repetition in several of his poems for effect, and also arranges his poems in a certain way to create a rhythm and allows the reader to smoothly read the poem.  Hughes wrote with faith and hope in his poems and always believed that the African Americans should fight for their equality and that they would achieve it in the future.  Hayden also wrote with hope and wanted to give the reader faith and allow them to come away from his poetry with the belief that they will someday be treated fairly and not be discriminated against.  For example, in his poem, “Frederick Douglass”, Hayden writes that the blacks will achieve freedom eventually and when they are they will all forever glorify the bold actions of Frederick Douglass, showing that he possesses hope towards the future, and encourages others to keep faith as well.  The influence of Hughes on Hayden is quite evident in the writing style and subjects of their poems, as one blogger put it,  

“The prototype of the civil rights poet was Langston Hughes, one of the earliest American Blacks to make a living as a writer.  Although he was associated with the “Harlem Renaissance” of the 1920s and ’30s, he lived into the Decade of Protest. Hughes’ output was enormous and covered the field; he wrote drama, fiction, autobiography, libretti for musicals, opera, and a cantata — but it is as a poet that he stood as a model for post-Modernist Blacks such as Robert Hayden” (American Blacks).

 

Both Hughes and Hayden saw some horrible beatings and racist people in his life, and wrote of their personal experiences as well as some historical events involving the African Americans.  Hayden did not really know what to do with all of his bottled up feelings towards what he had seen as a child, and when he got to college and began to study the works of other poets, he was drawn to the works of Hughes and learned how to organize his thoughts and became a much better writer, as I found on one blog,

 “During the twenty-three years that he taught at Fisk, his writing matured and deepened, influenced by such writers as Langston Hughes” (Poems and Poetry).

 

 

Robert Hayden and the Major Masters

“For American poets of Hayden’s generation, the development of a post-traditional poetry almost inevitably involved some kind of direct confrontation with received modernism. Hayden was certainly no exception. Beginning his career in the early 1940s, he was conspicuously aware of the previous generation’s legacy” (MEL).

Robert Hayden’s poetry expresses great influence from the major poetry masters such as T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound.  He took several ideas from them and used these to create his own, unique poetry centered on the African American race. 

 “Hayden was strongly influenced by the techniques of ‘New Criticism’, the strong reliance on imagery, symbolism, and the objective correlative, as practiced by the modern experimental masters, such as Eliot, and Pound” (Hatcher 69).

 Hayden writes mainly of historical events or people, bringing in the culture of the readers of his poetry, just as Eliot and Pound do.  Many of Hayden’s poems are about a famous African American who fought and made a difference for the lives of the slaves or the discriminated black people; he also wrote of painful events such as the middle passage and of happier events such as the underground railroad.  Eliot similarly wrote of the disillusionment of World War One, and Christianity, and Pound wrote of World War One and Two. 

“Most of the critics who have noticed the connections between Hayden’s poetry and Eliot’s have assumed that Hayden was, at least in matters of poetics, little more than a dutiful disciple, learning matters of technique from the master, and in some cases imitating him directly” (MEL).

 In Eliot’s poems, he sometimes makes references to the Bible and puts these lines in italics off to the side, and Hayden borrows this idea in some of his poems as well.  For example, in Eliot’s poem “The Hollow Men”, he says:

 

“Between the idea
And the reality
Between the motion
And the act
Falls the shadow
                                For Thine is the Kingdom

Between the conception
And the creation
Between the emotion
And the response
Falls the Shadow
                                             
  Life is very long

Between the desire
And the spasm
Between the potency
and the existence
Between the essence
And the descent
Falls the Shadow
                                For Thine is the Kingdom” (poetryx.com).

In Hayden’s poem, “Night, Death, Mississippi”, he writes about Jesus dying on the cross, and uses a similar technique to Eliot:

“Then we beat them, he said,
beat them till our arms was tired
and the big old chains
messy and red.

O Jesus burning on the lily cross

Christ, it was better
than hunting bear
which don’t know why
you want him dead.

O night, rawhead and bloodybones night

You kids fetch Paw
some water now so’s he
can wash that blood
off him, she said.

O night betrayed by darkness not its own” (blogspot).

Hayden also borrowed the technique of using imagery as a foundation, with more meaning than is shown on the surface.  For example, in Hayden’s “Those Winter Sundays”, he uses a lot of imagery that can be used to imply that the father is abusive towards the child, and is not actually as caring and kind as he seems to be.  Hayden also frequently uses enjambment in his poetry, and trait he took from Eliot.  Hayden uses this to continue his thoughts on the next line, creating more emphasis on the words used in the next line, and creating more flow for the poem.  The use of connotations also helps greatly to present an underlying meaning to all of his poetry.  He uses certain phrases that will make the reader have a happy or sad reaction to it, causing there to be a sad or happy tone to the poem, and allowing the reader to find the emotion and meaning to the poem.  He took this from Ezra Pound’s precisely rendered images, in which Pound uses a certain image to create a picture in the reader’s head, ideas from their associations and connotations, and an emotion and feeling towards the poem.  In order to create these images and emotions in the reader’s mind, Hayden uses the objective correlative, the layering of images, to create one major scene and image for the reader.  This can be seen in several of his poems, including “Frederick Douglass”, which I wrote about in my previous post.  Eliot uses this in most of his poems as well, and writes several short lines of description to create one larger image for the audience, as does Hayden with his poems.  This can be found all over Eliot’s poetry, one example is from “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”.

Deferential, glad to be of use,

Politic, cautious, and meticulous;

Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse;

At times, indeed, almost ridiculous—

Almost, at times, the Fool”  (poetryx.com).

Pound also uses a similar technique that he calls the “concrete particular” to layer one precise image onto another, and creates a specific emotion from the audience.  Both Pound and Eliot use free verse, as does Hayden, in order to make the poetry more musical and flow better.  Pound focuses on precise words and common diction in his poetry, to make it simple and easy for all to understand.  Hayden uses this idea in his poetry as well, as he always uses the precise words to get the description across, and does not overdo it with excessive imagery and flowery language.  One example of a short poem that I really enjoyed of Pound’s is “In a Station of the Metro”.

 “The apparition of these faces in the crowd;

Petals on a wet, black bough” (poetry.com).

Hayden wrote a similar two-line poem, that is condensed and says a lot in few words, taking after Pound’s technique in “Words in the Mourning Time”.

 “Killing people to save, to free them?

With napalm lighting routes to the future?” (Rampersad).

While reading Hayden’s poetry, I noticed that he took so many of his ideas and ways of writing from the masters of Eliot and Pound, and it was quite interesting to me how he made it his own and uniquely centers on African Americans.

Book Sources:

Hatcher, John. The Life and Poetry of Robert Hayden. Oxford: George Ronald, 1984. 130-31. 

Rampersad, Arnold. Collected Poems of Robert Hayden. New       York City: Liveright   Publishing Corporation, 1996. 15-20.

Those Winter Sundays

One of Hayden’s most anthologized poems in his collection is Those Winter Sundays, which is a poem told through the eyes of an older person reflecting on his or her father and the relationship the two had when the speaker was a child.

 

Sundays too my father got up early

And put his clothes on in the blueblack cold,

then with cracked hands that ached

from labor in the weekday weather made

banked fires blaze. No one ever thanked him.

 

I’d wake and hear the cold splintering, breaking.

When the rooms were warm, he’d call,

and slowly I would rise and dress,

fearing the chronic angers of that house,

 

Speaking indifferently to him,

who had driven out the cold

and polished my good shoes as well.

What did I know, what did I know

of love’s austere and lonely offices?

 

The child’s father would wake up early everyday of the week, even Sundays, and warm up the house before the child would wake up in the morning.  However, when the child does awaken, he or she is fearful of the father’s “chronic angers” in the house.  The poem 

“portrays a stark childhood devoid of affection. Despite the father’s attention to physical comforts there is a psychological barrenness that is disconcerting” (MEL)

The child is unhappy and fears the father everyday.  The poem has three stanzas of about equal length, with no rhyme and is free verse.  He uses assonance throughout the poem, allowing it to read more smoothly.  He also uses some hard consonants to describe the harsh ideas, such as “blueblack cold”, “cracked hands that ached”, “cold splintering, breaking”, and “chronic angers”.  The speaker uses phrases to indicate that the father is not as loving as he appears to be, and may actually be abusive with anger problems.  These help to create a sad and gloomy tone to the poem.  The speaker also creates a regretful tone, saying he feared his father’s outbursts everyday, causing the child to speak “indifferently to him”, rather than lovingly and respectfully as most other children did.  The speaker is reflecting on how he or she wishes that they would have taking more of a chance to stand up for his or herself against the father instead of cowering away from confrontation.  The poem hints at the beginning that the father is not selfless for waking up early and warming the house, as 

“One slowly becomes aware that it is not only the child who does not thank the hardworking father. “No one ever” did. This then reflects on the person of the father. There must be something about the way or the reason why the father performs his parental chores that creates or requires the apparent numbness in the speaker, even over the distance of the years” (MEL)

The poem contains a lot of imagery, describing the father’s appearance and actions.  It also describes the way the child fears the father, and this imagery allows the reader to get a more clear understanding of the relationship between the father and the child and what emotions both had toward each other.  Hayden uses metaphors throughout the poem, allowing a deeper meaning to unfold to the reader.  The father makes the fire and is trying to make the house warm to cover up the “blueblack cold”.  He is trying to do superficial things to try to cover up his mistakes made with his child, rather than actually talking with the child and creating a better relationship. 

“The warmth of the fire does not penetrate the atmosphere. Though the temperature in the house has apparently risen, there is still “blueblack cold” that must be dealt with” (MEL).

The father “polished [the child’s] good shoes”, and could be a metaphor for the father only telling others about the child’s achievements and neglects to address the mistakes or the “bad” shoes.   His father is trying to do nice things to fix the problems between him and the child; however, these are just not enough to rectify his other actions towards the child.

“The simple acts of love do not erase the negative remembrances” (Hatcher 131). 

With this closer reading, the audience can see that the father was not the kindest and most loving towards the child.  The poem’s main theme may be that one should not let others take advantage of them, and should instead stand up for one’s beliefs in order to live a happier and more fulfilling life without regrets in the future.  

 

Sources:

Gallagher, Ann M. ”Hayden’s ‘Those Winter Sundays.’.” The Explicator 51.n4 (Summer 1993): 245(3). Expanded Academic ASAP. Gale. Library of Michigan. 16 Mar. 2009Hatcher,

John. The Life and Poetry of Robert Hayden. Oxford: George Ronald, 1984. 130-31.

Copyright © katiesegr1′s Blog     Provided by WPMU DEV -The WordPress Experts    Designed by WPDesigner    Hosted by Edublogs.org